Technical Summary:
Year 1 Achievements
An ATRV-Jr. robot was purchased and
outfitted with orientation sensors and a DGPS for autonomous guidance (See
Figure 1). The autonomous guided vehicle (AGV) is operational and is
capable of GPS-based autonomous point-to-point guidance within a
geo-referenced perimeter as per Year 1 objectives. Obstacle avoidance
routines are nearing completion (May 2002). The ATRV-Jr. robot is ready for
sensor package implementation (Year 2 objectives).
- A
commercial all-terrain robotic research platform (ATRV-Jr.)
capable of autonomous operation was secured.
- The robot
was equipped with a Breeze-Net wireless network connection, allowing
wireless communication with robot and its subsystems.
- The
all-terrain vehicle was equipped with a magnetometer (digital compass)
and inclinometer (to determine the vehicle’s attitude).
- A SATLoc
SLX DGPS unit was installed on the robot and software written to read
the NMEA sentences into the ATRV-Jr.’s onboard computer.
- Software
code (C++) was developed for calibrating the absolute orientation of
the vehicle using the magnetometer/inclinometer and GPS position
data.
- Software
code (C++) was developed for traversing between geo-referenced points
using DGPS position data and magnetometer orientation data.
- The ATRV-Jr.
has been field-tested using a geo-defined field perimeter.
The base computer superimposes a systematic search grid within the
geo-referenced perimeter and transmits the grid to the ATRV-Jr.’s
onboard computer. Navigational software (C++), developed by the
authors, then uses DGPS and magnetometer input data to direct (steer
and propel) the ATRV-Jr. to each subsequent point defined in the
search grid as shown in Figure 2 below.
|

Figure 1. ATRV-Jr. with magnetometer, DGPS, and
wireless network.
|

Figure 2.
Computer generated search pattern with obstacles.
Year 2 Technical Summary
With the hardware and software programming necessary for the ATRV-Jr. to
navigate autonomously within a geo-defined field complete, the next step is
to develop sensor technologies for detection of fire ant mounds. After
reviewing various technologies that might be applicable, the research team
has concluded that a combination of thermal infrared and sonar sensors boom
mounted (similar to a spray boom) to the ATRV-Jr. would provide the best
methodology for infield real-time fire ant mound detection. Green (8)
reported that fire ant mound temperatures were generally higher than the
surrounding soil. This trend was consistent from April until August.
Preliminary testing, by the authors, revealed a 10 oF difference
in fire ant mounds and surrounding vegetation (~70 oF ambient
temperature) using a thermal infrared sensor. Sonar (ultrasonic
transducers) will be used to analyze feedback signals from the ground
surface. Using signal processing techniques, algorithms will be developed
to discriminate fire ant mounds. The combination of thermal infrared and
sonar sensor technologies should provide the necessary delineation.
Once fire ant mounds are located, the ATRV-Jr. will dispense the appropriate
pesticide. By systematically searching the entire field, pesticide will be
applied only to the target. This methodology will reduce environmental
impact and improve economics by reducing the quantity of pesticide used to
effective eradication.
Objectives:
1.
Year 1
- Successfully modify existing industrial robotic technology to accept and
follow GPS-acquired position information as a primary control parameter for
guidance. Status: Complete.
2.
Year 1
- Test a modified autonomous guided vehicle (AGV) to determine its safety
and usefulness as a platform from which to perform routine and repetitive
agricultural tasks. Status: Complete.
3.
Year 2
- Design and integrate sensor array package - Ant Colony Sensor (ACS).
4.
Year 2
- Investigate the usefulness of the AGV/ACS integration.
Procedure:
Remote Sensing
Fire ant mound detection will be performed as a multi-step process. First,
a near infrared remote sensing approach will be used to determine the most
likely locations for the ant mounds. Ant mounds will appear dark in the
infrared image and vegetation will appear light. Other areas, such as bare
soil, will also appear dark and will be differentiated using other methods.
Based on the near infrared data, the ATRV-Jr. robot will be dispatched to
field locations with a higher probability for fire ant mounds for thermal
infrared sensor testing.
A remote sensing image will be taken using a single band digital Charge
Coupled Device (CCD) camera with near infrared filters. The camera will be
supported by a tall camera pole to obtain high resolution images of the
field to be tested. The images will be geo-rectified using Erdas Imaging.
Once the image is rectified, the test algorithm will look for dark areas
within the light vegetation. A location file of the suspected sights will
be loaded to the robot for further analysis.
Ant Colony Sensor (ACS) Array Development,
Construction, and Implementation
A sensor boom will be attached to the ATRV-Jr. robot platform. The sensor
boom will consist of multiple thermal infrared sensors to ensure full
coverage of the ground. The width of the boom will be input into the search
grid generation software to insure that all portions of the test area are
covered by the ATRV-Jr. during a systematic field survey.
The sensor array will search for peaks in temperature on the ground
surface. Due to the thermal warming of the sun, ant mounds will typically
have a higher temperature than the surrounding vegetation and soil.
Seasonal effects do influence the temperature differential. This limitation
would not be a prohibitive for implementing a fire ant eradication program
using autonomous robotics, since field operations will typically be done in
weather conditions that favor temperature differentials in the fire ant
mounds.
To provide another degree of freedom to the thermal infrared sensors, sonar
sensors may be employed. Due to the hollow nature of the mound, reflected
sound waves will appear different than solid ground. Using signal
processing routines, a sound signature for fire ants will be used to truth
the thermal data.
Once an ant mound is detected, pesticides are distributed on the mound on a
site specific basis. Standard granular fertilizer applicators will be
modified and fitted to the ATRV-Jr. for pesticide application.
Effectiveness of the detection of mounds and of chemical application will be
based on the correct identification of ant mounds and the distance the
insecticide is discharged from the fire-ant mound detected.
Justification:
Automation technologies have greatly
increased the productivity of manufacturing processes. The two most
commonly employed guidance systems for industrial robots today are wire
guidance and laser guidance. These two methods along with advanced guidance
systems based on such technologies as radio telemetry and radar have been
successfully employed for autonomous rovers and robots within structured
environments such as laboratories, warehouses and manufacturing facilities
in industry, worldwide. Use of these technologies, however, is typically
infeasible on the scale required for agricultural operations. For this
reason, more robust technologies are sought for use in the field and many
potential solutions have been investigated (please refer to Section F of
the original 2001 ASTA proposal for a discussion of these). GPS seems to be
a good option given that GPS data is accurate enough to give acceptable
position information for many applications. This is the basis for the
guidance system produced during Year 1 of this project and has proven to be
valid as a means of guidance. The ATRV-Jr. robot, developed during Year 1,
provides a platform that can be used to provide a “proof of concept” for
many agricultural operations. As guidance and sensor technologies are
proven and implemented, the system can be scaled up or down to achieve
“real-world” agricultural/horticultural operations.
Other Uses for Autonomous Guided Vehicles (AGVs)
Automation technologies have greatly
increased the productivity of manufacturing processes. The two most
commonly employed guidance systems for industrial robots today are wire
guidance and laser guidance. These two methods along with advanced guidance
systems based on such technologies as radio telemetry and radar have been
successfully employed for autonomous rovers and robots within structured
environments such as laboratories, warehouses and manufacturing facilities
in industry, worldwide. Use of these technologies, however, is typically
infeasible on the scale required for agricultural operations. For this
reason, more robust technologies are sought for use in the field and many
potential solutions have been investigated (please refer to Section F of
the original 2001 ASTA proposal for a discussion of these). GPS seems to be
a good option given that GPS data is accurate enough to give acceptable
position information. This is the basis for the guidance system produced
during Year 1 of this project and has proven to be valid as a means of
guidance. The ATRV-Jr. robot, developed during Year 1, provides a platform
that can be used to provide a “proof-of-concept” for many
agricultural/horticultural operations. As guidance and sensor technologies
are proven and implemented, the system can be scaled up or down to achieve
agricultural/horticultural operations using autonomous guided vehicles.
Potential commercial applications for an all-terrain autonomous guided robot
are extensive. Conceivably, most of the repetitive field operations that
now require human operators could be automated with accurate geospatial-based
guidance and sensing capabilities. Here are just a few examples:
1.
Fire-ant control (as described in the original project proposal).
2.
Grid-based soil/vegetation sampling.
3.
Pesticide application (agricultural, horticultural, green industries,
etc.)
4.
Precision weed control on large regions such as pastures, airport
runways, theme parks, parking lots, etc.
5.
Automated monitoring of turf (height and condition) on golf courses
and sports fields.
Pesticide Application.
The implications of the use of robotic technology in the area of worker
safety alone are enormous. Use of automated pesticide application, for
example, would prevent worker exposure to spray drift. A noteworthy
consideration in this line of thought is that many substances thought to be
safe at one point in time have later been found to have toxic effects, such
as thalidomide (treatment for pregnancy discomfort which caused birth
defects) and dichlorobromopropane (DCDB, a nematocide banned by the USDA in
1976 which caused male sterility). Many chemicals themselves are non-toxic
but become toxic upon being metabolized in the human body. Because
compounds affect different species in different ways—even different
individuals within a species have varying susceptibility to
toxicity—long-term effects are difficult to predict in humans based on lab
tests on animals. Clearly, it behooves employers and workers to minimize
their exposure to pesticides. Robotic technologies could reduce workers
exposure to potentially harmful substances.
Worker Safety – Repetitive Tasks.
Another worker safety issue specifically addressed by automated task
performance is the reduction of injuries in workers; especially cumulative
trauma disorders (CTDs) in which long term exposure to ergonomically
hazardous tasks causes the gradual development of a musculoskeletal or
neurological injury. Long work cycles in the presence of such stressors as
awkward postures, extreme temperatures, and noise/vibration lead to these
conditions, which cost not only in terms of medical expense but also in
terms of productivity and product quality. Well-designed robotic work
increases precision in the performance of routine and repetitive tasks as
well as isolating human workers from potentially harmful substances and
decreasing the incidence of injury.
Green Industries (Golf Courses, Sports
Facilities, Theme Parks, etc.).
Golf courses and other green industries utilize large quantities of
pesticides and fertilizers. Site specific application of pesticides using
autonomous robotics would provide a tremendous cost savings in terms of
labor, and more importantly, this technology will reduce the environmental
impact associated with usage of these products. Since pesticide application
is accomplished with the autonomous robot, human interface with potentially
harmful chemicals is greatly reduced.
Fire Ants.
Fire ants cost Americans billions of dollars per year. The cost of fire ant
control in Texas alone is a billion dollars annually. It is a multi-million
dollar problem in Mississippi, with no county in the state immune.
Environmentally friendly site-specific eradication of fire ants is a
priority for the USDA ARS. In Mississippi alone, the federal request is 5.2
dollars for research in the area of fire ants (about 1.3 million to the ARS
research group in Stoneville, MS). With rising labor costs and shrinking
profit margins, it will become increasingly important to automate as many
repetitive operations as possible to shore up farm income.
Self-Guided Soil Sampler:
AVG travels to predetermined waypoints in a field and uses a low
power-consumption coring tool to collect soil cores and returns multiple
samples to the lab. Goal: Collection of soil samples with minimal labor
costs.
Autonomous Landscape Mapper:
AGV traverses a region with known boundaries, collecting precise elevation
data for input to GIS applications. Goal: Very accurate (1/10th
m topographic resolution) scanning of target regions.
Robotic Plant Monitor for Horticultural
Applications:
AVG, equipped with colorimetric sensors, moves in and around plants (small
trees, vines, or ornamentals) in a nursery, vineyard, or orchard setting to
analyze the condition of plants and fruits/vegetables. Goal: Reduction in
judgment requirement for agricultural workers, quicker response to disease,
and minimization of labor requirements.
Literature Review:
However, many advances have been made in the area of automation in
agriculture just in the past decade. Of course GPS/GIS technologies have
been on the forefront of precision agriculture for a number of years.
Advances in colorimetric techniques have led to new uses for satellite
imagery in crop stress detection (1,3,4). Faster and more capable computing
power, a limiting factor in some instances such as image processing for
machine vision, is now available. Machine vision has been used for crop
condition analysis (5), for plant recognition (6,9) and as a guidance
parameter (14,15,16,18).
Advances in sensor development make it possible for robotic manipulators to
physically handle plant material without damaging it (4,5,6,10,11).
Off-the-shelf guidance systems based on laser or telemetry techniques are
also available to make autonomous roving machinery a reality. These
technologies are converging to produce real opportunities for advances in
agricultural automation. Some examples of existing high-tech equipment
include robotic tomato, grape, and cucumber harvesters, as well as
geranium-cutting and chrysanthemum-cutting transplanters (7,9,10).
The limiting factor in many cases of
agricultural automation is the lack of a suitable platform from which to
operate such high-tech alternatives to human labor as machine vision and
advanced manipulation techniques. This machinery must be moved into the
proximity of the product, using a guided vehicle, to be effective. In an
enclosed environment, such as factory floors, warehouses and greenhouses,
nominal guidance technologies such as radio telemetry, laser, and
electromagnetic wire, are employed with great success. Use of these
methods, however, does not extrapolate well into an outdoor situation. For
this reason, such methods as geomagnetic direction sensing, fiber-optic
gyroscope, machine vision, wireless networking, and GPS have been
investigated as possible guidance parameters for use in the field
(13,15,16,20,21,22).
Reid relates that GPS has been used with
success as parameter vehicle guidance (17,18), but cautions that the most
accurate tracking can be accomplished by fusion of a sensor types. Noguchi,
et al, reported success in guiding a tractor using this approach in
1998 (13). It is important to note two important caveats with regard to
standing work on guidance of this type:
1.
So far, research has been
done with large vehicles—tractors with conventional power-trains and
steering mechanisms. It might be that smaller, nimbler machinery can
utilize GPS position information as a sole navigation signal.
2.
Research published heretofore
has proceeded during the era of Selective Availability (SA), an artificial
introduction of error into the raw GPS signal by the Department of Defense
designed to thwart its use by hostile parties. Now that the DOD has
disabled SA over the continental U.S., raw signals can be used to provide
more accurate positional information that may be useful for guidance
technologies.
Summary:
An ATRV-Jr. robot was purchased and
outfitted with orientation sensors and a DGPS for autonomous guidance. The
ATRV-Jr. is operational and capable of GPS-based autonomous point-to-point
guidance within a geo-referenced perimeter as per Year 1 objectives.
Obstacle avoidance routines are nearing completion (May 2002).
The implementation of an ant colony sensor
(ACS) array and pesticide distribution system will allow the ATRV-Jr. to
apply pesticides in a site-specific manner. More importantly, however, the
success of this project will open the door for utilization of robotics in
many other areas of agriculture.
The entrance of MSU into the research area of autonomous robotic technology,
as it applies to Precision Agriculture, opens the door to other research
funding opportunities (NASA, DOD, etc.) and demonstrates our commitment to
cutting-edge technological development. The technology for the SCEU concept
is real; it is only a question of who will do it.
An all-terrain robotic platform has been developed during Year 1 of this
project. The robot can systematically survey fields at a search interval
defined by the operator. The goal of building an autonomous robotic
platform capable of applying pesticides on a site-specific basis can be
achieved by installing a fire ant colony sensor array package and a
pesticide dispensing apparatus on the ATRV-Jr.
References:
Ahmad, I.S., J.F. Reid, N. Noguchi, and A.C.
Hansen. 1999. Nitrogen sensing for precision agriculture using chlorophyll
maps. ASAE Paper 993035. St. Joseph, MI.
Benson, E., Stombaugh, T., Noguchi, N.,
Will, J., and J.F. Reid. 1998. An evaluation of a geomagnetic direction
sensor for vehicle guidance in precision agriculture applications. ASAE
Paper 983203. St. Joseph, MI.
Blackmer, T.M., Schepers, J.S., Meyer, G.E.
1995. Remote Sensing to Detect Nitrogen Deficiency in Corn.
Fujiura, T., Yamashita, J., Kondo, N.
1992. Agricultural Robots (1): Vision Sensing System.
ASAE Paper 923517. St. Joseph, MI.
Kondo, N., Monta, M., Ymashita, J., Fujiura,
T. 1992. Agricultural Robots (2); Manipulators and Fruits Harvesting Hands.
ASAE Paper 923518. St. Joseph, MI.
Monta, M., Kondo, N., Shibano, Y., Mohri,
K., Ymashita, J., Fujiura, T. 1992. Agricultural Robots (3): Grape Berry
Thinning Hand. ASAE Paper 923519.
St. Joseph, MI.
Gopala Pillai, S., Tian, L, and Beal, J.
1998. Detection of nitrogen stress in corn using aerial imaging. ASAE Paper
983030. St. Joseph, MI.
Green, P. 1998. Effect of Imported Fire
Ants on Mississippi Soils. Masters Thesis, Department of Plant and Soil
Science, Mississippi State, MS.
Iida, K., Suguri, M., Umeda M., Matsui, T.
2000. Estimation of Nitrogen Content Using Machine Vision in Paddy Field.
ASAE Paper 003021. St. Joseph, MI.
Kondo N., Monta, M., Fujiura, T. 1996.
Fruit Harvesting Robots in Japan. Advanced Space Research, 18, 1 / 2,
181-184.
Kondo N., Shibano, Y., Mohri, K., Fujiura,
T., Monta, M. 1992. Request to cultivation method from tomato harvesting
robot. Acta Horticulturae, 319, 567-572.
Kondo N., Ogawa, Y., Monta, M., Fujiura,
Shiban, Y. 1996b. Visual Sensing Algorithm for Chrysanthemum cutting
sticking robot system. Acta Horticulturae, 440, 383-388.
Noguchi, N., J.F. Reid, J.Will, and E.
Benson. 1998. Vehicle automation system based on multi-sensor integration.
ASAE Paper 983111. St. Joseph, MI.
Noguchi, N., Reid, J.F., Q. Zhang. and L.F.
Tian. 1998. Vision intelligence for precision farming using fuzzy logic
optimized genetic algorithm and artificial neural network. ASAE Paper
983034.
St. Joseph, MI
Pinto, F., J.F. Reid, Q. Zhang, and N.
Noguchi. 1999. Guidance parameter determination using an artificial neural
network classifier. ASAE Paper 993004. St. Joseph, MI.
Pinto, F. and J.F. Reid. 1998. Heading
angle and offset determination using principle components analysis. ASAE
Paper 983113. St. Joseph, MI.
Reid, J.F. 1998. A status report on
Autonomous Guidance of Agricultural Vehicles in the US: New Frontiers in the
21st Century. RSJ Meeting, Sapporo, Japan. UILU-ENG-98-7026.
Reid, J.F. 1998. Precision Guidance of
Agricultural Vehicles. JSME Meeting, Sapporo, Japan. UILU-ENG-7031.
Simonton, W. 1992. Automation in the
Greenhouse: Challenges, Opportunities, and a Robotics Case Study. Hort
Technology 2(2), 231-235.
Will, J., T. Stombaugh, E. Benson, N.
Noguchi, and J.F. Reid. 1998. Development of a flexible platform for
automatic agricultural guidance research. ASAE Paper 983202. St. Joseph,
MI.
Will, J.D., D.D. Moore, E.N. Viall, J.F.
Reid and Q. Zhang. 1999. Wireless networking for control and automation of
off-road equipment. ASAE Paper 993183. St. Joseph, MI.
Zhang, Q., J.F. Reid, and Noboru Noguchi.
1999. Agricultural vehicle navigation using multiple guidance sensors.
Proceedings of the International Conference on Field and Service Robotics.
August 29-31. Pittsburg, PA. UILU-ENG-99-7013.
Current
Research:
1.
Phase II GPS Wastewater
Tracking System (GWTS) for Commercial Swine Production Facilities;
Sponsor: USDA/CREES Special Grant (Burcham, Thomasson, Lee). In progress.
An investigation of the use of GPS position information to effect variable
rate application of animal waste lagoon water onto a field. GPS information
is transmitted from a mobile station mounted on traveling gun of a hard hose
reel by radio modem to a remote base station. The position information is
then used by an in-house program to make decisions about speed control and a
control voltage is output to motor controller. This project is complete.
We are preparing a journal article to be submitted the Applied Engineering
in Agriculture.
2.
Robotics in Agriculture
Research project (Lee, Thomasson).
Ongoing investigation and literature review on the use of robotics in
horticultural applications. This has been conducted with the collaboration
of the Howell family at Rocky Creek Nursery, Inc. (Lucedale, MS), Dr. Hagen
Schempf of the Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, and the
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University.
(PI) Timothy N.
Burcham, Assoc. Prof, Ag. & Bio. Eng. Dept.
(Co-PI) Paul Lee,
Research Scientist, Ag. & Bio. Eng. Dept.
Back to Top
Back to
Menu
|